Best Practices

Agricultural Building Grants

State By State Index

 A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z


-A-

Alabama| Alaska| American Samoa | Arizona | Arkansas

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Alabama

Click here for contact information

Back to A index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Alaska

Click here for contact information

Back to A index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


American Samoa

Click here for contact information

Back to A index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Arizona

Click here for contact information

Back to A index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Arkansas

Click here for contact information

Back to A index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-C-

Calfornia | Colorado | Connecticut |

Back to Top | Back to Top | Back to State Index


California

Click here for contact information

Back to C index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Colorado

Click here for contact information

Back to C index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Connecticut

Click here for contact information

Back to C index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-D-

Delaware | District of Columbia

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Delaware

Click here for contact information

Back to D index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


District of Columbia

Click here for contact information

Back to D index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-F-

Florida

Click here for contact information

Back to Top | Back to State Index


-G-

Georgia | Guam

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Georgia

Click here for contact information

Back to G index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Guam

Click here for contact information

Back to G index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-H-

Hawaii

Click here for contact information

Back to Top | Back to State Index


-I-

Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Iowa

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Idaho

Click here for contact information

Back to I index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Illinois

Click here for contact information

Back to I index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Indiana

Click here for contact information

Back to I index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Iowa

Click here for contact information

Back to I index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-K-

Kansas | Kentucky

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Kansas

Back to K index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Kentucky

Click here for contact information

Back to K index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-L-

Louisiana

Click here for contact information

Back to Top | Back to State Index


-M-

Maine | Marshall Islands | Maryland | Massachusetts | Michigan | Micronesia | Minnesota | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Maine

Click here for contact information

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Marshall Islands

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Maryland

Click here for contact information

During the 2006 legislative session, the Maryland Barn Preservation Fund was created with the passage of House Bill 699. This bill established a ten-member “Maryland Advisory Committee on Historic Agricultural Structure Preservation” chaired by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of Planning. The bill also created the “Maryland Barn Preservation Fund” in the Department of Planning from which grants will be made to preserve historic barns and agricultural structures in the state.

To date, no funds have been appropriated in the state budget to the Maryland Barn Preservation Fund and no other money from any other source has been provided for the benefit of the Fund. Consequently, there has been no activity of the Fund or the Advisory Committee. It has yet to be determined how our agency would administer these funds (e.g. eligible applicants, easement requirements, etc.) should they become available as the language of the bill was not particularly clear – so am enjoying others’ responses.

Click here for the bill

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Massachusetts

Click here for contact information

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Michigan

Click here for contact information

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Micronesia

Click here for contact information

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Minnesota

Click here for contact information

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Mississippi

Click here for contact information

Of the two primary state-funded grant programs in Mississippi, the Community Heritage Preservation Grant Program, which focuses on historic schools and courthouses and CLG projects, requires that applicants be units of government or not-for-profit organizations. The other grant program, the Mississippi Landmark Grant Program, can be used to restore any designated "Mississippi Landmark" property, regardless of ownership.
In practice, however, our agency's Board of Trustees is reluctant to spend much public money on private property, so only a couple of privately owned "Mississippi Landmarks" have ever received funding through the program. In order to qualify for funding through either program, the historic property must first be a designated "Mississippi Landmark," pursuant to our State Antiquities Law, which places a preservation easement on the property for perpetuity.

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Missouri

Click here for contact information

Back to M index | Back to Top


Montana

Click here for contact information

In Montana we offer reimbursement grants ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 for the rehab of rural ag-related buildings. Of course work must meet the Standards and we attach a five-year easement to the building that receives the funding. Funding is open to all non-government entities with a priority on those properties already listed in the Register.

Our pot of money varies from year to year, but we typically pick three projects for funding. In some years we’ve been able to pay for nominations and brick and mortar work if the property is exceptional. States that base an applicant’s eligibility for the grant on their property’s NR status might consider helping owners of truly exceptional properties find funding for NR nominations.

Our program has worked well in terms of saving buildings and raising preservation’s profile around the state. The one major drawback is that we cannot make reimbursements for work done prior to July 1, the start of the state’s fiscal year. This date being the midpoint of Montana’s short construction season puts grant recipients in a pinch and adds complexity to projects that are already costly and complex.

Click here for program details

Back to M index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-N-

Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico |
New York | North Carolina | North Dakota | Northern Mariana Islands

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Nebraska

Click here for contact information

Back to N index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Nevada

Click here for contact information

Back to N index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


New Hampshire

Click here for contact information

Back to N index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


New Jersey

Click here for contact information

Back to N index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


New Mexico

Click here for contact information

Back to N index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


New York

Click here for contact information

Back to N index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


North Carolina

Click here for contact information

Back to N index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


North Dakota

Click here for contact information

Back to N index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-O-

Ohio | Oklahoma | Oregon

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Ohio

Click here for contact information

Back to O index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Oklahoma

Click here for contact information

Oklahoma has no such grants program.

Back to O index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Oregon

Click here for contact information

Back to O index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-P-

Palau | Pennsylvania | Puerto Rico

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Palau

Click here for contact information

Back to P index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Pennsylvania

Click here for contact information

Back to P index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Puerto Rico

Click here for contact information

Back to P index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-R-

Rhode Island

Click here for contact information

Back to Top | Back to State Index


-S-

South Carolina | South Dakota

Back to Top | Back to State Index


South Carolina

Back to S index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


South Dakota

Click here for contact information

Though it is not specific to ag buildings, South Dakota has a grant program for any SD property on the National Register, including private and public properties. Our office gets $100,000 every year from gaming revenues from Deadwood, SD that we give out in two cycles of $50,000. The grants must be matched at least dollar for dollar. The grants generally go to public buildings because our ranking guidelines give more points to public properties than private. But private properties on the National Register are eligible to apply and several have received grants as well, including agricultural properties. Grant recipients must file an eight-year preservation covenant before they can receive the grant. SHPO staff review all the applications to ensure they meet the Standards and then our Board of Trustees approves the awards. In general, the program works fine. Obviously, like everyone, we could use more money for the fund as we are only able to fund about 15-20% of what is requested each year.

If you want some more details on our Deadwood Fund grant program, you can go to our website at: http://www.sdhistory.org/HP/hp_deadwfg.htm .

Back to S index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-T-

Tennessee | Texas

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Tennessee

Click here for contact information

Back to T index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Texas

Click here for contact information

Back to T index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-U-

Utah

Click here for contact information

Back to Top | Back to State Index


-V-

Vermont | Virgin Islands | Virginia

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Vermont

Click here for contact information

Back to V index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Virgin Islands

Click here for contact information

Back to V index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Virginia

Click here for contact information

We administer a state grants program for which any resource type might be eligible if individually listed or contributing in a listed district. However, private citizens are not eligible to receive state grants; the property would have to be owned and/or operated by a local government or non-profit organization serving as the recipient of the funds. Easements are required if grant funds of more than $40,000 are awarded in a four year period. Work must conform with the standards per our review and approval. Other public interest/accountability requirements include competitive procurement procedures, site open to the public a certain number of days, match, etc. The biggest problem is the awards process; although we review applications and provide guidance to the appropriations committees, essentially awards are made however they wish in the budget bill. This means that it can be more about "pork" and politics and less about relative need, threat and objective public benefit, and winners do tend to be disproportionately those sites in districts with powerful legislators. And, a consequence is that legislators tend not to see the program as a program but as an "extra" when budgets get tight, so the number of grants and dollars vary hugely from year to year -- like 300 plus grants totally $50 million plus down to nothing. This is unfortunate for all sites who would welcome a greater degree of stability. Needless to say it means that our staffing requirements are subject to unworkable fluctuations that don't get factored in as the budget is finalized.

Back to V index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


-W-

Washington | West Virginia | Wisconsin | Wyoming

Back to Top | Back to State Index


Washington

Back to W index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


West Virginia

Click here for contact information

West Virginia has a state development grant program. We have funded barns if they are listed (usually contributing buildings). Private property owners are eligible. Covenants are required with the duration depending on amount of grant award. Work must meet the Standards and is reviewed by grant staff and monitors. We received approximately $2.7 million in request this year and had only about $500,000 to give away.

Back to W index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Wisconsin

Click here for contact information

Back to W index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Wyoming

Click here for contact information

Back to W index | Back to Top | Back to State Index


Click here to return to the National Conference homepage
Click to find staff lists, board information, general information about NCSHPO
Click here to find a list of State Historic Preservtion Officers
click here for information on current legislation, advocacy resources, NCSHPO initiatives and additional resources
Click here for educational opportunities, grants, awards and job listings
Click here for information about upcoming and recent NCSHPO meetings and minutes
Click here for links to partner organizations
Click here for legislative updates, archives, listserv, photos, and general NCSHPO organizational documents

Suite 342
Hall of the States
444 N. Capitol St. NW
Washington, DC 20001
phone: 202 624 5465
fax: 202 624 5419

For corrections or comments on the website please contact Kristen Harbeson at harbeson@sso.org